The Leica Q2

149-Q1000069.jpg

The original Leica Q arrived just in time for Christmas in 2014, it was a real surprise and has proved to be a well deserved success for Leica. My article on the camera “Hemingway: The Leica Q” was published when it was launched on June 10th, 2015.

At the time of release we were on an exciting trip to China, our son having arranged a varied (and challenging) routine. After our return I wrote another article, “The Leica Q in China”.

Since the release of the camera there has been lots of internet chatter about more Q cameras with different focal lengths (principally a 35 or 50mm). But Leica’s attitude was that having a 28mm lens with framelines for 35 and 50mm gave maximum flexibility.

I often get asked whether I have purchased the subject of my camera testing. At this point it’s worth mentioning that if I had bought everything I’ve tested, I would long since have been bankrupted! In the case of the original Q (Typ 116), although I really enjoyed everything about the camera, for me and my use it had a couple of real drawbacks for use as a travel camera.

First of all the resolution, 24 mp at 28mm was fine (my ‘sweet spot’ still). The 35mm crop of 15.4 mp was also good for most purposes, but the 50mm crop of 7.5 mp was a bit tight for normal use.

Secondly, lots of my photography is in the dreadful English weather – or the beautiful Cretan weather. In one case, rain is a real problem (and I can’t be taking cameras in and out of bags all the time). In the other case, dust and sweat are just as much of a problem.

So, with regret, on July 13th, 2015, I sent my well-used Q back to Leica. I wonder what’s happened to it now!

Sometime at the end of November 2018, the Q2 arrived on my doorstep. This time it’s going to be a much harder decision to send it back!

At this point it’s worth mentioning that my role with Leica is to test the cameras, not to write reviews of them. And, it’s important to understand that this article is not intended to be a critical review. If I find something wrong with a camera, then I tell Leica. Having said that, this article is my work, nobody has suggested what I should write, and I certainly wouldn’t say anything that I don’t believe to be the case or omit anything that seemed to be an issue.

BASIC FEATURES OF THE Q2

  • New full frame 47mp image sensor.

  • Weather sealed, dust & splash proof. (You can see I’m doomed!)

  • New, faster Maestro family processing engine.

  • Same 28mm Summilux f/1.7 ASPH lens.

  • New OLED EVF. (Same 3.68mp resolution as Q116, but clearer.)

  • Extended ISO range from 50-50,000.

  • Video: 4K (30 or 24 fps) Cine4K (24 fps)

Full HD (24, 30, 60 or 120 fps).

  • Higher speed AF.

  • Higher capacity battery (Same battery as the Leica SL.)

  • Faster top electronic shutter speed. (1/40,000th sec)

  • New 3 button user interface. (Similar to the Leica CL.)

  • Touch screen functionality on the LCD

  • Improved digital zoom with framelines crops for 28mm, 35mm, 50mm & 75mm

  • Improved WiFi & Bluetooth

That’s quite a lot of improvements for what, superficially at least, looks more of a refresh than a replacement. Everything about the camera has been changed or improved, with the ex- ception of the lens, and it’s easy to argue that the lens was already as good as it needed to be. Whether it’s still good enough for a 47mp sensor is a legitimate question, and I’ll be looking at that later on.

PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES

At first sight, the camera looks pretty much identical to the original Q116, but there are quite a number of subtle differ- ences.

On the back of the camera the five-button layout has been replaced by the three-button layout of the Leica CL. It took me a while to get used to this, but I’m now firmly of the belief that Leica has got it right and found an interface which can be used over a number of different cameras. It’s something I’ve been asking and hoping for for a long time.

The three buttons are:

  • Play

  • Menu

  • FN

The four-way switch is the same as the one on  the Q116.  I suppose I’d have preferred to have a ‘joy stick’, but this does work okay. The Zoom Lock/Digital Zoom button is also the same as that on the Q116. On the front of the camera and on the lens, all is as it was with the Q116.

On the top of the camera there are a couple of changes. As with the M10 and the CL, the On/Off switch no longer has the drive mode switching (Single/Continuous), although it is still a collar around the shutter release button, which is now squared off, like a black version of the button on the CL. I much prefer this.

The dial is embedded in the top plate like the Q116, but now has a large central button which acts as a second function button (more about this in the interface section). It has replaced the red video button in the original Q116.

The base of the camera has changed as well. Whereas the Q116 had a single opening door with battery and SD card access, the Q2 has replaced this with two openings. One is a battery compartment which works like the SL: when the battery is inserted it forms part of the base plate, with a rubber 0-ring to keep the moisture out. The SD card door needs to be pushed to one side to pop it open. The whole thing seems very solid and well designed.

The finish of the original camera was excellent and the new one seems to be just the same. I’ve been using it for over three months in rain and shine (not too  much  shine, but  plenty of rain!). Certainly it’s seen much more rain than it would have done if it had been my own camera and there has been absolutely no sign of problems or water ingress.

BATTERY LIFE

Officially battery life (CIPA) is 350 photos which doesn’t sound very impressive. I didn’t check this out, but I found that it easily lasted a day with normal shooting. It’s also great that it uses the same batteries as the SL – at least if you also shoot with an SL!

USER INTERFACE

Leica seems to have worked hard to get the interface for their different cameras into line. This has been an evolutionary process, but now they seem to have arrived.

The S and SL began the move to customizable buttons and the long press/short press distinction together with the intro- duction of the Favorites Menu. Whilst the first example of the three-button layout occurred on the M10. This was slightly refined and rationalized for the CL (and the buttons moved around). The interface on the Q2 is nearly identical to the one on the CL. So much so that you can duplicate favourites and user profiles on the two cameras (which I really like). It would be even nicer if you could transfer profiles between the cameras.

THE PLAY BUTTON

This is just what you would expect, press it and the image you last took is displayed. Where it is displayed depends on the EVF-LCD setting in the menu, the options are:

  • LCD • AUTO

    • EVF Extended • EVF

The Auto option relies on an eye sensor in the viewfinder. EVF Extended means that when shooting one is confined to the EVF, but with the Play or Menu button the image/menu comes up on the LCD unless you have your eye to the view- finder. LCD means that everything is directed to the LCD. EVF means that everything is directed to the EVF.

THE FN BUTTON

(And the button on the dial on the top plate.)

Once again, this works the same way as the CL. A short press brings up the assigned/last used function. A long press brings up the list of functions assigned to the button. This is straightforward in use, but also allows a lot of customization. You can configure the list of functions in the Customize section in the menu.

THE MENU BUTTON

The menu button brings up the favorites menu which can be configured in the Customise option in the Main Menu. It’s possible to have 15 options (two-screens full). In practice, I found it better to have seven options, which fits on a single screen. The last option is always Main Menu, and this can’t be changed (quite right too).

Pressing the Menu button twice brings up the Main Menu. This is organized into five pages (no menu bloat here). Each further press of the menu button takes you to the next page.

THE FOUR-WAY CONTROLLER

This works as it did in the Q116 – you use the arrow keys to move through the menu options and the central button to select.

When you are shooting the arrow keys will move the static focus point, and the central button toggles between:

  • No information

  • Bottom line of information

  • Bottom & top lines of information

  • Video mode (ouch!)

  • No information (etc)

 
 

Bottom line of information:

  • PASM • ISO Setting (Auto/ISO)

    • Actual ISO • F Stop

    • Exposure Comp. • Exposure Time

    • Shots Left

Top line of information:

  • MF/AF Mode • White Balance

    • DNG/JPEG • Exposure Mode

    • Drive Mode • Film Style

    • OIS (On / Off / Auto) • Battery Remaining

I’m really not happy with video mode being in the cycle of the central button. On more than one occasion, I thought I had taken a picture whereas instead I had started shooting a video. I would have thought it was much more sensible to be able to assign video to one of the function buttons, but that doesn’t seem to be a possibility. I’m hoping this will be modified later in the firmware.

 
 

THE ZOOM/LOCK BUTTON (On the back of the camera next to the thumb indentation.)

It can be assigned to:

  • Digital Zoom • AEL / AFL

  • AEL • AFL

This is okay, but it might be good if these functions could also be assigned to the other function buttons (and other functions assigned to this button).

However, there are two problems. Firstly, you cannot assign AFL (Focus Lock) or AEL (Exposure Lock) to the button and then disable it from the shutter release button. It doesn’t worry me, but many people like to shoot like this.

[Correction: (March 9th) Thanks to Gotium on the Leica User Forum for pointing out that in fact, if you choose AFL for the zoom lock button then focusing is disabled from the shutter release – as long as you keep pressing the zoom lock. Same goes for AEL. if you choose AEL/AFL then the release button just takes the picture.]

Secondly, if you press the AFL button to focus (or AEL button to lock exposure), you must keep it held down until you have pressed the shutter.

What would be really nice is to have a hold/toggle option in the menu for this. So that the value was saved until you pressed the button again. Many other cameras have this feature, and it is extremely useful.

THE RIGHT-HAND DIAL & 2ND FUNCTION BUTTON

The right-hand dial is embedded in the top plate the same as it is on the Q116, with a central button acting as a second function button (instead of the video button on the Q116). This works like the right hand dial on the Leica CL.

The dial has been moved round the camera slightly and I found it a stretch with my right hand (but I have rather small hands). I’m not sure what the logic for this was, but it’s only a minor irritation.

The new function button on the other hand is great – easy to reach and very useful…

THE ON/OFF SWITCH

Some people will miss the On/Off switch doubling as a drive mode switch, but you can easily put drive mode onto first press on one of the function buttons, and it does stop one making the mistake of going into continuous mode inadvertently.

TOUCH SCREEN LCD

This is pretty much the standard for Leica now – it’s not usable in the menus, in shooting mode there is touch focusing for static focus point and this works reasonably well. In Play mode, the normal gestures work accurately and as you would expect.

HANDLING & ERGONOMICS

The basic controls are identical to the Q116, i.e. the aperture, shutter speed and focus controls on the lens and body. The macro mode works the same way, delightfully bringing up a different distance scale for the manual focusing as you move to macro mode (This is so very sexy!).

The shutter speed dial is the same, with 1+ to 1/2,000 second and A(uto) mode for the leaf shutter in the lens. Electronic shutter speeds up to 1/40,000 are available as well – a great improvement on the 1/16,000 of the Q116).

The right dial can be set to:

  • OFF • Auto*

  • Exposure Comp.

*Works differently in PASM and is slightly confusing.

THE DIGITAL ZOOM

Digital zoom is something of a dirty word in the photography industry, probably from the days when small megapixel cameras offered gravelly shots at apparently extended focal length.

I think it’s a bit different with the Q, partly because the base resolution is so high, and partly because the implementa- tion is so good and so consistent with the Leica rangefind- er. This hasn’t changed in principle since the Q116, but it has suddenly become a whole lot more useful with the extra resolution.

Implementation of crop mode or digital zoom in other cam- eras usually involves the EVF/LCD zooming in. With the Q2 you can change between four focal lengths using the Zoom/ Lock button. Choosing a longer focal length simply puts framelines in the display showing what you are going to get.

If you shoot JPG files then that is exactly what you do get. If you shoot DNG then the image is not actually cropped. However, you use Lightroom CC or Classic, then the DNG file appears in cropped form. You can use the crop tool to change or remove the cropping in post processing.

The four digital zoom modes are: (Addition thanks to John Kot in DPReview for calculating effective aperture.)

  • 28mm – 8368 x 5584 (47 mp) – Effective aperture f/1.7

  • 35mm – 6704 x 4472 (30 mp) – Effective aperture f/2.0

  • 50mm – 4688 x 3128 (14.6 mp)- Effective aperture f/2.8

  • 75mm – 3136 x 2096 (6.6 mp) – Effective aperture f/4.6

I think this is a great feature, and with the increased resolution of the Q2, it makes the 50mm crop zone perfectly usable and the 75mm okay in a pinch, especially as the lens is so sharp.

Of course, it doesn’t actually turn the lens into a different focal length, but the aspect ratio of the resulting image is exactly the same. What you lose is the depth of field relating to the cropped focal length. Basically, this will always be the same as that of a 28mm f/1.7, so it’s harder to use bokeh to isolate the subject.

 

USER PROFILES

I have talked to lots of people about the User Profiles, but very few people seem to use them. I think they are just great.

Like the CL, the Q2 has six user-configurable profiles (plus Default). You can rename them sensibly, and they will save pretty much everything except time and date. The Q is slightly more limited, as you can’t save information which is on phys- ical dials (Aperture, Shutter Speed, PASM mode).

Generally speaking I have four different modes which I use regularly with different settings for White Balance / Focus Mode / Auto ISO Settings / Exposure Metering.

  • Daylight: For shooting outside in the daytime

  • Nighttime: For shooting in Artificial light

  • Monochrome: For shooting on those drab winter English days, with the JPG setting changed to high contrast black and white. This really helps to concentrate on composition rather than color.

  • Tracking: With continuous AF and tracking mode enabled for dogs, footballers, birds, grandchildren.

No need to go into specific settings (Although I can if anyone is interested.) The point is to have a good starting point for your common photographic situations, and to be able to swap between them quickly and easily

 

FOCUSING

If you wish to focus manually, you need to push a small indent on the focusing tab on the lens. Manual focusing is very smooth and nicely weighted, and it feels like proper manual focusing, with a proper distance scale, even though it is actually focus by wire. The big, clear EVF makes focusing simple, there are the normal focus assistants:

  • Auto Magnification

  • Focus Peaking

Having been a great advocate for focus assist, I’ve now had a change of heart. I think that modern, high resolution EVF viewfinders like the Q2 are quite good enough to focus man- ually, and that focus peaking muddies the water rather than making it easy, and that auto magnification makes composi- tion so much harder. So I turn them off, and I’ve been getting almost all of my manual focused images just right.

The Auto Focusing options are:

  • Multi Point • Spot

    • Field (one area) • Tracking

    • Face Detection • Touch AF (LCD)

I haven’t spent much time with the tracking – it seems a slightly odd option for a 28mm lens. The other options work well, autofocus is very fast and very accurate.

158-Q1000178.jpg
 

THE LENS & IMAGE QUALITY

We all know that the Q116 lens was absolutely good enough for 24 mp, but is it good enough for 47.3 mp?

Looking through my pictures, it seems that it certainly is. I’ve not seen any unsharp images which are not a function of either the photographer or the situation. The lens still has enviable corner to corner sharpness and it’s breathtaking how far one can zoom in and still see detail.

On the other hand, I’ve always felt that 24 mp is the sweet spot for digital images, and I’ve not spent a lot of time investigating cameras with higher resolutions. I’m certainly not seeing any of the sort of problems that were reported getting sharp images with other high resolution cameras. Perhaps this is helped by the optical image stabilisation.

The new full frame CMOS sensor promises 47.3 mp resolution from a 50.4 mp Sensor with 14 stops of dynamic range and a 50-50,000 ISO range. I think that 50 ISO is likely to be a ‘Pull’

as the camera defaults to using 100 ISO as the base with Auto

ISO selected.

Looking through my images I can see that I did use 6400 and 5000 ISO a few times and the results were fine – a little noise as you might expect, but good color representation and perfectly usable.

FOTOS APP & THE FUTURE

Currently I have not been able to use the Q2 with Leica Fotos App (It isn’t ready yet.) but the camera has both Wifi and Blue- tooth, so we can hope for GPS tagging from mobile phones and a front-to-back workflow with Adobe Lightroom CC.

CONCLUSION

The original Q (Typ 116) was a brave step for Leica, and was a well deserved success. The Q2 has built on that at every level:

  • Higher resolution

  • Faster processing

  • Better interface

  • Weather sealing

  • Viewfinder (EVF)

  • Bluetooth & Fotos

There are a couple of changes I’d like to see made in a future firmware update, but this camera behaved properly and reliably with beta firmware.

The only real competition for the Q2 is the Sony RX1Rii, a 42 mp camera announced in 2015 (Only 4 or 5 months after the original Q116).

The Q2 is capable of making images to compete with many medium format digital cameras, all in a package you can slip into a coat pocket.

Operating the Q2 is a total pleasure: it’s fast and responsive, autofocus is excellent and manual focus smooth and easy to use. High ISO and dynamic range is up there with the best full-frame digital cameras and the electronic viewfinder is a joy to behold. All this is available in a package which weighs 730 grams including the battery.

If you want a small and beautifully made camera, a rewarding shooting experience and peerless results then there really isn’t anything to compete with the Q2.

64-Q1000267.jpg
Previous
Previous

Vintage Leica Ads: 1925-1937 Marketing the Wetzlar Wunderkind and its Illustrious Offspring

Next
Next

Reflections Upon a Lake