Revenge of the Red Dot

May 12, 2020  By Jason Schneider

Ostentatious, iconic, or both, the legendary Leica logo is loved, loathed, and often covered up.

It’s safe to say that no other graphic design element in the Leica’s long history has generated as much controversy as the iconic Leica/Leitz red dot. The eye-catching red circle was originally emblazoned with the word Leitz in script when it first appeared on the Leica R3 in 1976 and the first production run of 100 Leica M4-2s in 1977. A strikingly similar black circle Leitz logo can also be found on the Leitz Televit rapid-focus device dating as far back as the late ‘60s. The red Leitz version was dropped on subsequent M cameras and then reappeared on the front covering of the M4-P in 1981.

The Leica M6 (essentially an M4-P with built-in TTL metering) of 1984-2003 marked the transition from the Leitz red dot to the current Leica red dot. Early examples had the Leitz insignia, and  post-1986 models had the now familiar Leica red dot with the venerable “swoopy-L Leica in script” logo (that first appeared on the Leica II (model D) of 1932) in contrasting white. With minor cosmetic variations it’s the same Leica red dot now used on current Leica cameras including  the Leica M10, SL2, CL, and Q2. In 1986, E. Leitz Wetzlar changed its name to Leica (now Leica Camera AG) in recognition of the worldwide fame of Leica cameras, and ever since 1999 the bold, assertive Leica red dot has been the official company logo. Whether or not you want it emblazoned prominently on your camera is really a matter of personal taste, but it’s a timeless, instantly recognizable graphic design that effectively conveys the power, prestige, and uniqueness of the Leica brand.  

Red dot rage, red dot follies and the red dot cover-up.

Back in 2011, Leica Store Brasil in São Paulo ran a clever ad purporting to show that the iconic Leica red dot logo has remained the same since 1913, or what would then have been a 98-year run. While it’s a cool looking ad that definitely gets your attention, regrettably it’s 100% false and misleading. The glorious “sweeping L” Leica script logo first appeared in 1932, engraved on the top of the landmark Leica II (model D), the first Leica with a built-in coupled rangefinder. And as mentioned, the red dot with white Leica in script that’s shown 25 times on the one-page ad first appeared on the M6 starting around 1986. Finally, the unspecified black Leica M displayed prominently in the ad has no red dot at all—what were they thinking?

One infuriated gent responded to the ad with a post mocking Leica fans for “falling for it,” noting that the ad is factually incorrect, and conjecturing that the 1913 logo probably featured Leitz more prominently. In fact, the only “Leica” that could have dated from 1913 was one of Oskar Barnack’s Ur-Leica prototypes which bore no logos at all. And all Leicas made prior to 1932 were indeed engraved with the distinctive E. Leitz Wetzlar logo that dates back to the 19th century. The post continues with a vicious attack on what he perceives as pretentiousness: “What this logo represents for me these days is smugness, elitism, and nostalgia…rich hipsters and (expletive deleted) celebrities who think that buying a certain brand of camera makes them better photographers.” Hyperbolic red dot rage.

As you may know there are many ardent Leica fans who adore or abhor the red dot  (sometimes both) and engage in passionate pro and con debates about it in various Leicaphile chat rooms. And there’s a coterie of discreet street shooters and travelers who don’t want to advertise that they’re carrying an expensive Leica and tape over the red dot (or the entire camera) with black electrician’s or gaffer’s tape to foil thieves and gushing admirers. Of course, if you’re buying a new or pre-owned Leica, you can avoid both the debate and the cover-up entirely by simply opting for one of the many Leica models without a red dot, such as the digital Leica M10-P and M10 Monochrom or the analog Leica MP. Finally, if you manage to lose your precious red dot, Leica Store Miami will be happy to sell you a replacement for your M6, M7, M8, or M9 for a mere 20 bucks. As for me, I think it’s an attractive logo, but I don’t consider it either an asset or a liability because, at the end of the day, it’s the Leica, not the logo, that really counts.


i have often wondered (aside from battlefield photogs who want all black for stealth) what thief worth their salt will pause and say, whoa, stop it looks like a Leica (and a Fuji X100xyz or X-Pro 123 or Bessa/Rollei/Zikon fine as they al are do not look like a Leica (sorry) ) but it lacks the red dot, I had better wait (a long while) until a Leica with a red dot appears. I sort of want a red dot on my M4-2 to match my M4-P etc but don’t want to “fake it”…

Long live the red dot! I wish my M-9s had the engraved top logo as well!

Be safe be well and happy shooting

Mark Kronquist, Oregon

pix at fb mark kronquist open to all

Jason I need to find your books and write more of them I gave my set away to a retiring photog who was a mentor to me

Nice article! Maybe you could follow up one day with some quotes from interviews you do with Leica users explaining their ‘red dot practice’.

I confess to covering up or removing the dot on my cameras that have it. Funny enough, when I left my chrome M10 with Leica Wetzlar for adjustment it was (later) brought out to me in the waiting room with an apologetic comment and a new red dot on the camera. The employee said that they could not permit a camera that sells with the dot to leave the repair shop WITHOUT the dot. I suppose it was actually a good thing as I had removed the dot and placed a round piece of black gaffers’ tape over the gaping hole that was left (a nice accent on a silver camera, I thought.) That hole, by the by, is the access to the rangefinder adjustment screw. I now just put silver tape over the dot.

Lest those of you who eschew such monkeying with the classic looks of the Leica M think I am silly, I do know of at least two people who have been robbed of their Leica cameras; one was actually attacked from behind and dropped to the ground by being hit over the head. His camera was taken – but recovered by himself(!) at a local flea later!

I travel the planet extensively and only once has someone made a comment about my camera being a Leica when the red dot was covered (people do comment about my using an old-fashioned camera. But significantly less often now that Fuji has silver-topped X-cams.) With the dot visible, comments are not common but people do recognize it more often. Sometimes it is just another photographer nudging a companion and nodding my way with a comment I cannot overhear.) Anything that saves me grief when traveling (like having my camera lifted by thieves) is a good thing. My gear is insured but losing one while on the road can be catastrophic – particularly as Leica has no quick loan program for the M line like Nikon has for their pro cameras.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Story
A Tribute to Ted Grant - Inspiration from the Father of Canadian Photojournalism "Real photographers shoot black and white, eat sushi, and drink single malt Scotch - not necessarily in that order, but it works...